Public vs. Private Event

2019/04/15

The following church-related scenarios represent my opinion on the subject of the differences between a public event and a private event.   This distinction is critical to know because different food safety laws and regulations apply to each category.

PRIVATE EVENTS

Coffee Hour after a church service is intended for members of the congregation and their invited guests.  Even if the worship service is advertised to the general public, coffee hour is not intended to be an invitation for members of the general public to eat doughnuts without attending the worship service.  Therefore this a private event.  In general, non-TCS foods are served.

Fellowship Breakfast after a church service is intended for members of the congregation and their invited guests.  Even if the worship service is advertised to the general public, a fellowship breakfast potluck is not intended to be an invitation for members of the general public to eat pancakes, sausages, and bacon without attending the worship service.  Therefore this a private event.  In general, some TCS foods are served.

A Wedding Reception is only for invited guests.  This is clearly a private event.

AMBIGUOUS

A Birthday Party is generally for invited guests only and would therefore qualify it as a private party.  However, if the person is well-known and there is wide distribution beyond the congregation and advertising to the general public, this would then become a public event.

A Funeral Reception is for church members and, in general, people who knew the deceased person.  Therefore, it could be classified as a private event.  However, an obituary is generally published in newspapers, remembrances solicited on funeral parlor websites, and listed in online church events calendars.  Public event definition 60-b-ii says events that are advertised by “newspaper articles, radio or television announcements, or on an Internet website as being open to the public” are public events.

A Chili Cookoff for members of the congregation would be considered a private party.  In the same manner as a birthday party described above, if there is wide distribution beyond the congregation and advertising to the general public, this would then become a public event.

PUBLIC EVENTS

Fall Festivals and other large community outreach events are generally not just for church members.  Phrases such as “Come One, Come All” are typical of this type of event to which the general public is invited.

Choir Concerts and other large community outreach events are generally not just for church members.  Although the main purpose is for members of the general public to hear the concert, many times non-TCS food is served at a reception afterwards.  Therefore I would categorize the concert/reception as a public event.

YOUR COMMENTS

Comments on these scenarios, and others you would like to submit for discussion, are most welcome.  Use the “Leave a Reply” feature below.

REFERENCES

List of TCS Foods, Maryland Food Handlers (accessed 04/14/2019)
https://www.mdfoodhandlers.com/Content.aspx?PageName=TCS

Not a Potluck!, David Robert Lambert Blog (August 25, 2012, accessed 04/14/2019)
https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/not-a-potluck/

Churches are in the Fellowship Business, David Robert Lambert Blog (December 7, 2018, accessed 04/14/2019)
https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2018/12/07/churches-are-in-the-fellowship-business/

Definition (60) Public Event, Code of Maryland (COMAR) 10.15.03.02 (accessed 04/14/2019)
http://www.dsd.state.md.us/comar/comarhtml/10/10.15.03.02.htm

(60) Public Event.

(a) “Public event” means an event or festival that is a planned gathering that is:
(i) Open to the public; and
(ii) Regulated by the State or local jurisdiction in which the planned gathering takes place.

(b) “Public event” includes an event or festival:
(i) Attended by individuals from the general public whether or not a fee is charged; or
(ii) Advertised with fliers, banners, newspaper articles, radio or television announcements, or on an Internet website as being open to the public.

(c) “Public event” does not include a:
(i) Private party;
(ii) An event restricted to organization members; or
(iii) Another event that restricts the general public from attending.

Public vs Private Events, San Francisco Department of Public Health (accessed 04/15/2019)
https://www.sfdph.org/dph/EH/Food/Permits/permitSpecPublicvPrivate.asp

What is a Cottage Food Business?

2019/02/28

UPDATED 05/15/2019

In 2012, Maryland passed a modified Cottage Law, allowing for citizens to operate a home based bakery or home food processing company.  The law was updated in 2018; as of this writing on February 28, 2019, the Code of Maryland Regulations were last updated on January 29, 2019.

An undated memo “Guidance for Cottage Food Businesses” issued by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Environmental Health Bureau, gives a summary of the main points of these regulations.

It incorrectly states that “COMAR 10.15.03 defines a cottage food … business”.  The full citation is Code of Maryland Regulations Sec. 10.15.03.02. Definitions.

The Guidance also is incomplete in saying that cottage food products can be “offered for sale only at a farmer’s market or public event.”  This is in conflict with the Maryland Department of Health, Office of Food Protection, information which states that a “cottage food” product is a non-hazardous food offered for sale directly to a consumer from a residence, at a farmer’s market, at public events, by personal delivery, or by mail delivery (not offered for sale through interstate commerce.)  Possibly residence, by personal delivery, or by mail delivery was added after the Guidance was written but this cannot be substantiated.

COMAR Sec. 10.15.03.02. Definition (17)-1 talks about residential kitchens with annual revenues not exceeding $25,000.  Definition (17)-2-a says sales can only be made at a “farmers market or public event”. Definition (17)-2-b goes on to say that Maryland cottage foods may NOT be “offered for sale through Internet sales or interstate commerce.” There is no mention of sales by other means, neither in the residence, nor by personal delivery, nor by mail.

The only other mention of cottage foods in Sec. 10.15.03.02. is in definition (34)-c-vii that states that a cottage food business is NOT a Food Service Facility.

Yet another discrepancy can be found in the Farmer’s Market, Bake Sales, and Cottage Food section 10.15.03.27 where A(2) says cottage foods may be sold at a “farmer’s market, bake sale, or public event.”

Note that the term “potentially hazardous food” (PHF) was dropped in 2013 from the FDA Food Code, the recommendations upon which other jurisdictions base their food laws and regulations.  This term has been replaced with “TCS” foods, those that require time/temperature control for safety.  However over 5 years later, the State of Maryland and Montgomery County have yet to adopt this change in terminology.

COMAR Sec. 10.15.03.27 goes into detail saying that cottage foods can be:

  1.  Non-potentially hazardous hot-filled canned acid fruit jellies, jams, preserves, and butters,
  2.  Fruit butters,
  3.  Jam, preserve, or jelly,
  4.  Non-potentially hazardous baked goods,
  5.  Foods manufactured on a farm,
  6.  Non-potentially hazardous candy, and
  7.  All other non-potentially hazardous foods produced by a licensed entity.

Natural Honey (Unflavored and without any processing or additives) is cited as allowable by the University of Maryland Extension.  However, flavored honey requires a processing permit.  There is no mention of honey in Sec. 10.15.03.27.

Allergen information must be as specified by federal labeling requirements; “Major food allergen” includes: milk, egg, fish (bass, flounder, or cod), crustacean (crab, lobster, or shrimp), tree nuts (almonds, pecans, or walnuts), wheat, peanuts, and soybeans.

Sec. 10.15.03.27 C-(1)-c gives labeling requirements with regards to name, address, product name, ingredients, net weight/volume, and allergen information. The label must include the disclaimer “Made by a cottage food business that is not subject to Maryland’s food safety regulations.

The following are changes cited in Maryland HB0527/CH0370 that will become effective on October 1, 2019.

Definition (b-2) now has two parts.  The existing, now part one, is unchanged regarding direct sales to individuals.  Part two is being added to say that sales will be permitted “TO A RETAIL FOOD STORE, INCLUDING A GROCERY STORE, OR A FOOD COOPERATIVE.”  For such sales, the label must also include the “PHONE NUMBER AND E–MAIL ADDRESS OF THE COTTAGE FOOD BUSINESS; AND THE DATE THE COTTAGE FOOD PRODUCT WAS MADE.

Before sale to a retail store or food cooperative the State Health Department needs “DOCUMENTATION OF THE OWNER’S SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF A FOOD SAFETY COURSE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT; AND THE LABEL THAT WILL BE AFFIXED TO THE COTTAGE FOOD PRODUCT”

Each year, beginning December 30, 2020, the State Health Department must submit a report to the “SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE HOUSE HEALTH AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE” with information about Cottage Food sold to food stores and food coorperatives.

These 2019 changes were approved by the Governor of Maryland on April 30, 2019.


REFERENCES
accessed February 28, 2019

Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Environmental Health Bureau
Memo providing Guidance of Cottage Food Businesses
https://mda.maryland.gov/maryland_products/Documents/Cottage_Food_Guidelines.pdf

Code of Maryland Regulations
Sec. 10.15.03.02. Definitions
http://mdrules.elaws.us/comar/10.15.03.02

David Robert Lambert Blog Post
Hazardous is a Scary Word (2019/02/26 at 12:38)
https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/hazardous-is-a-scary-word/

Code of Maryland Regulations
Sec. 10.15.03.27. Farmer’s Market, Bake Sales, and Cottage Food Business
http://mdrules.elaws.us/comar/10.15.03.27

University of Maryland Extension
Maryland’s Cottage Food Business Law
https://extension.umd.edu/mredc/specialty-modules/cottage-food-business-law-md

Maryland Department of Health, Office of Food Protection
COMAR Regulations 10.15.03.02, 10.15.03.27
https://phpa.health.maryland.gov/OEHFP/OFPCHS/Pages/CottageFoods.aspx


REFERENCES
accessed May 15, 2019

Institute for Justice, Maryland House Passes Bill to Expand Opportunities for Home Bakers
https://ij.org/press-release/maryland-house-passes-bill-expand-opportunities-home-bakers/

General Assembly of Maryland, HB1106/CH0491
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmMain.aspx?id=HB1106&stab=01&pid=billpage&tab=subject3&ys=2018rs

Forrager, Cottage Food Community, Maryland
https://forrager.com/law/maryland/

TrackBill Maryland SB290, Public Health – Cottage Food Products – Definition and Sale
https://trackbill.com/bill/maryland-senate-bill-290-public-health-cottage-food-products-definition-and-sale/1658034/

General Assembly of Maryland, HB0527/CH0370, effective date October 1, 2019
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmMain.aspx?id=HB527&stab=01&pid=billpage&tab=subject3&ys=2019rs

 

 

Hazardous is a Scary Word

2019/02/26

The Oxford English Dictionary defines HAZARDOUS (adj.) as 1) fraught with hazards or risk; dangerous; risky 2) of a person: given to risk-taking; reckless; adventurous 3) of the nature of the game of hazard; dependent on chance, and 4) that is or represents a hazard to human or animal health; that is damaging to the environment.  A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL (n.) isany of various substances considered to be especially dangerous to humans, the environment, etc., if not handled, used, or stored in a particular way and HAZARDOUS WASTE (n.) is waste, esp. industrial waste, that is potentially harmful to human health or to the environment and which requires special facilities for its disposal.

Cigarette smoking harms nearly every organ of the body, causes many diseases, and reduces the health of smokers in general.  It is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States as evidenced by causing more deaths each year than the following five causes combined: 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 2) illegal drug use,
3) alcohol use, 4) motor vehicle injuries, and 5) firearm-related incidents.  More than 10 times as many U.S. citizens have died prematurely from cigarette smoking than have died in all the wars fought by the United States.

Clearly, cigarette smoking is hazardous to your health, but what about food?  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, a federal agency of the Department of Health and Human Services) used to use the term “potentially hazardous foods” to describe many of them.  Of course meat, poultry and fish need special handling but what about a leafy green salad and cut tomatoes?  Yes, even a salad!

A potentially hazardous food (PHF) or time/temperature control for safety food (TCS) is defined in terms of whether or not it requires time/temperature control for safety to limit pathogen growth or toxin formation.  The list of TCS foods may surprise you.  Basically, if you need to keep a food item in the refrigerator, it’s a TCS food.  That means everything from milk and cheese and eggs and meat, all the way down to cooked rice.  Why use such a scary term, potentially hazardous, for everyday food items?  Why try to associate these common foods with cancer, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl?

Here is the story about TCS foods.

The FDA publishes the Food Code, a model that assists food control jurisdictions at all levels of government by providing them with a scientifically sound technical and legal basis for regulating the retail and food service segment of the industry (restaurants and grocery stores and institutions such as nursing homes). Local, state, tribal, and federal regulators use the FDA Food Code as a model to develop or update their own food safety rules and to be consistent with national food regulatory policy.

Between 1993 and 2001, the Food Code was issued every two years. With the support of the Conference for Food Protection (CFP), FDA decided to move to a four-year interval between complete Food Code editions. During the interim period between full editions, FDA may publish a Food Code Supplement that updates, modifies, or clarifies certain provisions. The 2005 Food Code was the first full edition published on the new four-year interval, and it was followed by the Supplement to the 2005 Food Code, which was published in 2007. The 2017 Food Code is the most recent full edition published by FDA.

In 2009, the FDA Food Code had a definition of Potentially Hazardous Food on page 15:

Potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food)
means a food that requires time/temperature control for safety (TCS) to limit
pathogenic microorganism growth or toxin formation.

Following issuance of the final report “Evaluation and Definition of Potentially Hazardous Foods” (Technologists, 2010) by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) on December 31, 2001 the recommendation was made to change the name of “potentially hazardous foods” or “PHF” to “temperature control for safety food” or “TCS”. The report advised that use of both terms (e.g. PHF/TCS) during a transition phase would facilitate migration from one term to the next. Now over a decade since the IFT report, the transition term has been in common use in the FDA Food Code since 2005.

In 2012, the CFP made a recommendation to the FDA to change the definition of PHF/TCS to TCS.

The definition of “Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food)”, abbreviated PHF/TCS in the FDA Food Code, has now been in common use for over six years. While it has served its purpose for introducing the new term, the time has come to complete the migration to the new definition. The definition and abbreviation for “Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food)” or “PHF/TCS” should be modified to drop the reference to “potentially hazardous food” and “PHF”. Instead, the definition should read “Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food” abbreviated as “TCS”.

The Conference recommends that a letter be sent to the FDA requesting the following change to the 2009 Food Code (as modified by the Supplement issued in 2011):

Replace the current definition “Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food)” abbreviated as “PHF/TCS” with the new term “Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food” abbreviated “TCS” throughout the entire FDA Food Code.

The FDA acted on this 2012 recommendation and dropped the PHF term throughout the 2013 FDA Food Code.  The FDA Food Code is the model upon which states and other jurisdictions base their food-related laws and regulations.

However, now over 5-years later, neither the State of Maryland nor Montgomery County has done the same.

 

REFERENCES accessed February 23, 2019.

Oxford English Dictionary
hazardous, adj.; hazardous material, n.; hazardous waste, n.

Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/

Conference for Food Protection, Council I, 2012 Scribe Packet, Issue Number: Council I 004
Change definition of PHF/TCS to TCS
http://www.foodprotect.org/issues/packets/2012ScribePacket/issues/I_004.html

MARYLAND Food Handlers List of TCS Foods
https://www.mdfoodhandlers.com/Content.aspx?PageName=TCS

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code
https://www.fda.gov/food/GuidanceRegulation/retailfoodprotection/foodcode/

2009 FDA Food Code
https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170404235435/https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM189448.pdf

2013 FDA Food Code and Supplement
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/FoodCode/UCM374510.pdf
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/FoodCode/UCM451981.pdf

FDA Food Code 2017
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/FoodCode/UCM595140.pdf

FDA Training Resources, Program Information Manual, Retail Food Protection Training Resources
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/IndustryandRegulatoryAssistanceandTrainingResources/ucm113843.htm
Page Last Updated: 01/29/2018

Code of Maryland (COMAR) Regulations (Last Updated: July 29,2016)
Title 10. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Subtitle 15. FOOD, Part 3.
Chapter 10.15.03. Food Service Facilities
http://mdrules.elaws.us/comar/10.15.03

Chapter 15. Eating And Drinking Establishments – Montgomery County
http://montgomeryco-md.elaws.us/code/core_ch15_15.00.01

Help Reduce Food Waste

2018/12/10

Tom Vilsack was Secretary of Agriculture from 2009 until 2017. In 2013 he called on both the public sector and private industry to reduce food waste. He said the USDA was going to:

  • “Develop a nationwide social media campaign with our partners to focus on precisely what the use by date and the sell by date means so that folks don’t discard food prematurely.”
  • “Continue to use our social media to develop a new food storage application that will give people up to date information on how and best to store food and what constitutes safe or unsafe food.”
  • “Work with our school lunch program to reduce food waste in our schools.”
  • “Look for ways we can increase donations of imported fresh produce that for whatever reason don’t meet our marketing order standards.”

VILSACK SAID THAT WASTING FOOD IS A MORAL ISSUE
IN A NATION WHERE THERE ARE HUNGRY PEOPLE.

He said that “part of this is thinking about portion sizes.”

How many times have you gone to a restaurant and have been served much more than you can eat? My wife has a solution. She literally cuts her meal in half before she starts and eats exactly half — what will-power! On other occasions, we order two soups or salads and split one entrée so we have no leftovers.

Vilsack also said that “understanding precisely what the food safety rules are so that you are not discarding food that would otherwise would be healthy and nutritious for your family.”

How many times have you brought home leftovers to weeks later find it hidden in the back of the fridge?  Our solution: take a piece of masking tape and date the container.  Depending on the type of food, throw it out within 3-4 days or a week if it hasn’t been eaten in a timely manner.  Stores do stock rotation based on “best by” dates.  You can do the same in your refrigerator and freezer with your store-bought or leftover food.

There are other things you can do to keep your family safe from foodborne illness.  As the USDA, FDA, CDC and Ad Council public service announcements say: Clean, Separate, Cook and Chill.

4-simple-steps
http://www.foodsafety.gov

 

In 2016 Vilsack said “Forty percent of the food grown in the country is wasted. That amounts to 133 billion pounds of food wasted. That is billion with a B. Considering we have about 45 million people receiving assistance through SNAP, I believe this is a tremendous opportunity for us to take a closer look at our food chain, and figure out a way to ensure that food grown in this country reaches the dinner table and not the trashcan.”

At a food waste summit in 2016, Secretary Vilsack commented that “avoiding food waste loss could save U.S. families on average $1,500 a year, and limiting food waste globally could help prevent hunger and malnourishment in the 825 to 850 million people worldwide who are not getting adequate food.”He went on to say “Tackling food waste in this country is, and should be a nonpartisan issue that will be most successful by engaging everyone in the food chain, from the field to the table. It will take the collaboration of all stakeholders to be successful.”

 

So I ask: What are YOU doing to help reduce food waste?

SOURCES

Ending Food Waste, David Robert Lambert, June 7, 2013
https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/ending-food-waste/

Food Waste from Field to Table, U.S. House of Representatives Hearing, 114 Congress,
Serial No. 114-52, May 25, 2016 (accessed 12/10/2018)
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-114hhrg20309/html/CHRG-114hhrg20309.htm


Expiration Dates, or lack thereof, David Robert Lambert, November 7, 2018
https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2018/11/07/expiration-dates-or-lack-thereof/

Churches are in the Fellowship Business

2018/12/07

In 2000, Congress found that houses of worship, particularly those of minority religions and start-up churches, were disproportionately affected, and in fact often were actively discriminated against, by local land use decisions. Congress also found that, as a whole, religious institutions were treated worse than comparable secular institutions. Congress further found that zoning authorities frequently were placing excessive burdens on the ability of congregations to exercise their faiths in violation of the Constitution.

As research into food safety laws and regulations, on 12/07/2018 I did a Google Search on several terms that relate to church kitchens and church activities.  I am not trying to be the food safety police; I’m just collecting publicly available information to make the point that churches and other houses of worship are in the fellowship business and onerous Montgomery County, Maryland, food safety requirements are putting, as RLUIPA 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. says, “substantial burden” on them rather than the “least restrictive means.”  Such strict restrictions do not appear in the Code of Maryland.

I did the following searches and have captured and reviewed the first 5 pages of each search result:

church pancake breakfast maryland – Google Search
About 1,070,000 results, typical entries include:

  • St. Paul’s United Methodist Church (Pancake Breakfast)
  • Saint Paul Catholic Church (Monthly Pancake Breakfast)
  • Meadow Branch Church (Pancake-Breakfasts)
  • Calvary United Methodist Church (Pancake Breakfast Fundraiser)
  • Hughes Memorial Presbyterian (Christmas Bazaar, Pancake Breakfast & Visit with Santa)
  • Church of the Ascension (Country Breakfast Buffet)
  • Calvary United Methodist Church (Pancake Breakfast/Yard Sale)
  • etc.

church spaghetti supper maryland – Google Search
About 339,000 results, typical entries include:

  • St. Leo the Great Roman Catholic Church (Ravioli & Spaghetti Dinners)
  • Bethel Presbyterian Church (Spaghetti Dinner)
  • Johnsville United Methodist Church (Spaghetti Dinner)
  • St. Matthias Church (Spaghetti Dinner/Holiday Bazaar)
  • Church of the Nativity (Spaghetti Dinner)
  • St Luke’s Episcopal Church (Annual Spaghetti Dinner)
  • Zion Evangelical Lutheran UCC (Spaghetti Dinner)
  • etc.

church chili cook off maryland – Google Search
About 3,320,000 results, typical entries include:

  • Maryland City Baptist Church (Annual Chili Cook-Off)
  • Middletown United Methodist Church (Chili Cook Off)
  • First Presbyterian Church (Chili Cook-Off)
  • Washington Area Intergroup Association at a UMC (Chili Cookoff)
  • United Church of God (Chili Cook-off)
  • Severna Park United Methodist Church (Chili Cook-off)
  • etc.

Take, for example, the Chili Cook-off at Severna Park UMC.  They say: “Bring a slow cooker containing your best chili recipe or other fall soup (already cooked) to SPUMC’s kitchen by 4:30pm to enter into one of five competition categories.”  Such an event would be prohibited in Montgomery County because all the entries would be cooked at home and home kitchens cannot be licensed as Food Service Facilities.  Even if they could be licensed, very few congregational members would have the credentials to be a Certified Food Services Manager, a requirement for operating a licensed kitchen.  Furthermore, if the church were to notify the health department that they wanted to be “Exempt” like fire stations and secular fraternal organizations (American Legion, Moose Lodge, VFW, etc.) the exemption in Montgomery County would not allow any potentially hazardous TCS foods like meat or poultry,  main ingredients of many chili recipes.  Even cooked beans and cut tomatoes are TCS foods, those that require Time and Temperature Control for Safety.

The above analysis is for events that are advertised and open to the public.  There are no restrictions on a private event like a birthday party or a wedding where each of the guests has received an invitation.  Once you advertise an event on your outside sign board, post the event on your website or advertise the old school way by tacking a flyer on a telephone pole, you have made the event public and must follow the food safety laws and regulations of your jurisdiction.

REFERENCES

U.S. DOJ, Place to Worship Initiative – What is RLUIPA?
https://www.justice.gov/crt/place-worship-initiative-what-rluipa

U.S. DOJ, Guide To Federal Religious Land Use Protections
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2010/12/15/rluipa_guide.pdf

Severna Park United Methodist Church, Chili Cook-off
https://severnaparkumc.org/chili/

MARYLAND Food Handlers List of TCS Foods
https://www.mdfoodhandlers.com/Content.aspx?PageName=TCS

Organizations Exempt from Kitchen Licensing

2018/11/29

I knew of “exempt”, meaning a homeless lunch program or soup kitchen, but upon further examination, the State of Maryland’s definition is much broader.

My read on this is that any 501(c)(3) nonprofit, including houses of worship of any denomination or faith, can prepare/cook and demo/taste/serve any type of food (TCS as well as non-TCS) to the public, without the need of a licensed kitchen, as long as this is not done more than 4 days a week.

Of course this needs to be verified and all the i’s dotted and t’s crossed with the health department, but I think I have uncovered an important piece of information, especially with regards to cooking demonstrations. It is very encouraging that the Montgomery County (Maryland) Health Department Inspection database has an “Excluded organization” category.

If secular nonprofit organizations like the American Legion, VFW and Moose Lodge are exempt from kitchen licensing, then all churches, religious organizations as well as clergy should be also.

REFERENCES

MARYLAND Food Handlers List of TCS Foods
https://www.mdfoodhandlers.com/Content.aspx?PageName=TCS

IRS Publication 1828 Tax Guide for Churches & Religious Organizations
Congress has enacted special tax laws that apply to churches, religious organizations and ministers in recognition of their unique status in American society and of their rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Churches and religious organizations are generally exempt from income tax and receive other favorable treatment under the tax law.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf

Code of Maryland (COMAR) Regulations (Last Updated: July 29,2016)
Title 10. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Subtitle 15. FOOD, Part 3.
Chapter 10.15.03. Food Service Facilities
http://mdrules.elaws.us/comar/10.15.03

COMAR Sec. 10.15.03.02. Definitions – Code of Maryland Regulations
(28a) “Excluded organization” means a bona fide nonprofit fraternal, civic, war veterans’, religious, or charitable organization or corporation that does not serve food to the public more often than 4 days per week, except that once a year an organization may serve food to the public for up to 14 consecutive days.
http://mdrules.elaws.us/comar/10.15.03.02

There are currently 7 excluded organizations listed by the Montgomery County Health Department:
o AMERICAN LEGION #086
o BAUER DRIVE COMMUNITY CENTER
o BLAKE BOOSTER CLUB CONCESSION STAND
o GWENDOLYN E. COFFIELD COMM. CENTER
o POTOMAC COMMUNITY CENTER
o VFW TAKOMA POST 350
o WHEATON MOOSE LODGE #1775
https://stat.montgomerycountymd.gov

Expiration Dates, or lack thereof

2018/11/07

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimates as much as 40 percent of all food grown, produced and shipped in the U.S. will never be eaten.

A confusing system of food labeling has led to consumers throwing away billions of dollars worth of food products every year, and much of that food is completely safe to eat.

“A lot of people confuse quality and safety,” food research scientist Linda Harris said. “That’s a big problem.”

Harris is the chair of Food Science and Technology at the University of California, Davis. She said most food is perfectly safe to eat past the date on the label. That’s because most dates on food are not “expiration” dates. They actually tell consumers when peak freshness or flavor drops off.

“The date is meant to signal quality,” Harris said. “It’s not a safety issue.”  “It’s not illegal to sell a product past its ‘best-by’ date,” she said.

The only items required by federal law to be labeled for expiration are infant formula and some baby foods; some states also mandate pulling dairy from store shelves on the expiration date.  The actual term “Expiration Date” refers to the last date a food should be eaten or used.

The labeling “sell by” tells the store how long to display the product for sale.  This is basically a guide for the retailer, so the store knows when to pull the item.  The “sell by” date is the last day the item is at its highest level of quality, but it will still be edible for some time after.

“Best if used by (or before)” date. This refers strictly to quality, not safety. This date is recommended for best flavor or quality. It is not a purchase or safety date.

Ref 1: ‘Use By’ Dates on Food Create Consumer Confusion, June 19, 2018
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Use-By-Dates-on-Food-Create-Consumer-Confusion-485818791.html

Ref 2: Do Food Expiration Dates Really Matter? – WebMD
https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/features/do-food-expiration-dates-matter

Ref 3: Wasted: How America Is Losing Up to 40 Percent of Its Food from Farm to Fork to Landfill
https://www.nrdc.org/resources/wasted-how-america-losing-40-percent-its-food-farm-fork-landfill

Ref 4: USDA Office of the Chief Economist
https://www.usda.gov/oce/foodwaste/faqs.htm

 

WWJD? vs. DWJWD

2018/08/15

What Would Jesus Do?

Last Sunday’s New Testament reading (08/12/2018) was from Ephesians 4. According to the Revised Common Lectionary, the reading was Ephesians 4:25-5:2, Rules for the New Life. At the church I attended and served as Lay Reader, I first read Ephesians 4:17-24, The Old Life and the New.

. . . surely you have heard about him and were taught in him, as truth is in Jesus. You were taught to put away your former way of life, your old self, corrupt and deluded by its lusts, and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds, and to clothe yourselves with the new self, created according to the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness. . . . be imitators of God, as beloved children, and live in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us . . .

This passage reminded me of WWJD. “What would Jesus do?” became popular, particularly in the United States but elsewhere as well, in the 1990s and as a personal motto for adherents of Christianity who used the phrase as a reminder of their belief in a moral imperative to act in a manner that would demonstrate the love of Jesus through the actions of the adherents.

Note the word ACTIONS in the above description. I have thought of this often over the last few decades and have come to the conclusion that thinking about WWJD in a particular situation is not good enough. I began to think there should be an extension of this, something more proactive vs. just thinking about WWJD.

I now think of this saying as DWJWD, do what Jesus would do.

Love the Lord your God and your Neighbor as Yourself

2018/05/14

Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. The second is this: Love your neighbor as yourself. There is no commandment greater than these.
Mark 12:30-31 (NIV)

Shirley Erena Murray (born March 31, 1931) is a New Zealand hymn lyrics writer.  Her hymns have been translated into several European and Asian languages and are represented in more than 140 hymn books around the world.  In addition to New Zealand, they are particularly used in North America.  In 2001, she became a member of the New Zealand Order of Merit for “services as a hymn writer”.  In 2006, she became a fellow of the Royal School of Church Music.  She received an honorary doctor of literature degree from the University of Otago in 2009.  The same year, she was named a fellow of the Hymn Society in the United States and Canada.

Her hymn ‘Community of Christ‘ begins “Community of Christ, who make the cross your own, live out your creed and risk your life for God alone.”  The full second verse is “Community of Christ, look past the Church’s door and see the refugee, the hungry, and the poor. Take hands with the oppressed, the jobless in your street, take towel and water, that you wash your neighbor’s feet.”

This verse reflects Matthew 25:35-45 (NIV) which says: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me. … Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.”

Eugene H. Peterson, author of ‘The Message‘, paraphrases this same Matthew 25 passage:  “Then the King will say, I’m telling the solemn truth: Whenever you did one of these things to someone overlooked or ignored, that was me — you did it to me. … Whenever you failed to do one of these things to someone who was being overlooked or ignored, that was me — you failed to do it to me.”

What have you done for your neighbor lately?

Perfect is the Enemy of Good

2017/02/11

A widely accepted interpretation of “The perfect is the enemy of the good” is that one might never complete a task if one has decided not to stop until it is perfect: completing the project well is made impossible by striving to complete it perfectly.  An alternative interpretation is that attempts to improve something may actually make it worse.  Neither the Shakespeare and Voltaire constructions suggest perfection, only improvement, lending support to this interpretation. Earlier, Aristotle, Confucius and other classical philosophers propounded the related principle of the golden mean, which counsels against extremism in general.  The Pareto principle or 80–20 rule is a 20th-century analogue.  For example, it commonly takes 20% of the full-time to complete 80% of a task, while to complete the last 20% of a task takes 80% of the effort.  Achieving absolute perfection may be impossible and so, as increasing effort results in diminishing returns, further activity becomes increasingly inefficient.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good

I was trained as an Electrical Engineer and spent much of my career as a Computer Programmer and later as a Webmaster.  Now, after retirement, I volunteer in several ways: one as Treasurer of a nonprofit and as Database Coordinator for another nonprofit.  Although many times I am paid for my web work, my nonprofit rates are very reasonable.

We strive for “perfect” when we are balancing our checkbooks but on some rare occasions it just doesn’t balance and we have to trust the bank more than our own math so we make an adjustment entry.

When dealing with name and address data, it would be nice to spell a person’s name correctly but due to illegible handwriting, that may not be possible. I often lookup the Zip+4 to verify an address.  If the post office (now called the Postal Service) can’t find it in their database, maybe the street name is misspelled or an apartment number is missing.  Given whatever information is currently on hand, that has to be “good enough” and we trust that a letter will be delivered.  If not, the postal service will return it to the sender marked Undeliverable as Addressed. Even if the address is 100% correct, the recipient may have moved and the letter may be returned with a notation of No Forwarding Address or Forwarding Time Expired. In these cases, we may settle for “good enough” and drop that person from the mailing list.

However for important things, we should go the extra mile, striving for “perfect”.  I recently sent out over 100 year-end IRS tax statements and one was returned, not with Forwarding Time Expired, but with their new address because they had recently moved.  I immediately put the letter in a new envelope and paid 49 cents a second time to mail it because it was important.  Had this been a postcard advertising my church’s Christmas Concert held over a month ago,  “good enough” would not be to ignore the returned postcard but to take the extra time to update that person’s address in the church records.

I am well aware of the 80/20 rule, especially in nonprofit work; 20% of the people do 80% of the work.  Sometimes I think that 10% of the people do 90% of the work.  I don’t mind contributing my time and effort to my church or a nonprofit if there are others that are also willing to help with a project.  However, if I get “stuck” doing the whole thing myself, I sometimes charge them at my nonprofit rate which is lower than the current value of volunteer labor.
Ref: https://lambertdrl.wordpress.com/2011/04/02/monetary-donation-vs-value-of-volunteer-time/

What are your experiences?